Which leadership style to choose

[subornaakter20]

There is no universal management style, and in order to determine the appropriate type of manager, you need to take into account the current situation.

If you use only one style in all cases, effective management will be impossible, since some employees will feel comfortable, while others will burn out, or become lazy and miss deadlines.

To achieve good results, you need to interact peru mobile phone numbers database with different employees in a certain style. For example, when working with experienced people, a democratic style is suitable, since they can be given freedom and make decisions based on several opinions, and with newcomers, it is better to use an authoritarian style to help them get used to it and reduce stress.

In exceptional cases, for example, if a newcomer understands the essence of the issue perfectly, you can give him more freedom, thus demonstrating the trust of the management in the person. If an experienced employee is faced with a task for the first time, then he needs to be instructed and use an authoritarian style.

When the situation at the enterprise changes dramatically, for example, a department needs to be scaled up, and the authoritarian style prevents this, the manager can change it in relation to all team members, but some employees may be lost in the process.

Changes in management style as subordinates grow can be difficult to accept. The boss must explain why he decided to give them more freedom and responsibility.

Read also!

"How to increase the flow of customers by choosing the right method"
Read more

Types of leaders according to Adizes
Dr. Ichak Calderon Adizes defined four types of leaders in management (four styles of management). It is difficult to say whether it is more about leadership or management, but in the title of the book the author himself uses the concept of "management styles". This suggests that the Adizes model is intermediate.

Manufacturer (Paei)
Such a manager is characterized by a desire to achieve results, as well as excellent knowledge of his work, its specifics and certain patterns. Achievements and progress towards the goal are important to the manufacturer.

First of all, he gives an answer to the question "What?" and in his assessments or answers he is as precise as possible. The word "yes" means "yes" for him, and if he says "no", it means "no". If we assume that the producer does not have the remaining three functions (P -), then he, according to Adizes, is a lone hero who has taken on all the work.